Detecting Heart Attacks Using Learning Classifiers

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have emerged as a critical global threat to human life. The diagnosis of these diseases presents a complex challenge, particularly for inexperienced doctors, as their symptoms can be mistaken for signs of aging or similar conditions. Early detection of heart disease can help prevent heart failure, making it crucial to develop effective diagnostic techniques. Machine Learning (ML) techniques have gained popularity among researchers for identifying new patients based on past data. While various forecasting techniques have been applied to different medical datasets, accurate detection of heart attacks in a timely manner remains elusive. This article presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of various ML techniques, including Decision Tree, Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting, Multilayer Perceptron, Gradient Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbor, and Logistic Regression. These classifiers are implemented and evaluated in Python using data from over 300 patients obtained from the Kaggle cardiovascular repository in CSV format. The classifiers categorize patients into two groups: those with a heart attack and those without. Performance evaluation metrics such as recall, precision, accuracy, and the F1-measure are employed to assess the classifiers’ effectiveness. The results of this study highlight XGBoost classifier as a promising tool in the medical domain for accurate diagnosis, demonstrating the highest predictive accuracy (95.082%) with a calculation time of (0.07995 sec) on the dataset compared to other classifiers

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Deep Capsule Network and Latent-Dynamic Conditional Random Fields

Because of the large variabilities in brain tumors, automating segmentation remains a difficult task. We propose an automated method to segment brain tumors by integrating the deep capsule network (CapsNet) and the latent-dynamic condition random field (LDCRF). The method consists of three main processes to segment the brain tumor—pre-processing, segmentation, and post-processing. In pre-processing, the N4ITK process involves correcting each MR image’s bias field before normalizing the intensity. After that, image patches are used to train CapsNet during the segmentation process. Then, with the CapsNet parameters determined, we employ image slices from an axial view to learn the LDCRF-CapsNet. Finally, we use a simple thresholding method to correct the labels of some pixels and remove small 3D-connected regions from the segmentation outcomes. On the BRATS 2015 and BRATS 2021 datasets, we trained and evaluated our method and discovered that it outperforms and can compete with state-of-the-art methods in comparable conditions

A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

Abstract Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic . Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches , while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end

A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

Abstract Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic 1,2 . Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches 1 , while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach 2 that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities 3 in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end